Showing posts with label christopher lee. Show all posts
Showing posts with label christopher lee. Show all posts

Thursday, March 11, 2010

ALICE IN WONDERLAND (2010) - 1/5 stars

Alice 2
Release: 2010
Director: Tim Burton
Writer: Linda Woolverton, Lewis Carroll (loosely based on the works of Carroll)
Cast: Mia Wasikowska, Johnny Depp, Helena Bonham Carter, Anne Hathaway, Crispin Glover, Michael Sheen, Stephen Fry
Soundtrack: Danny Elfman
Claim to fame: Tim Burton's "vision" of Wonderland...in 3-D, AKA "Wonderland for Hot Topic tweens"
Rating: 1/5 stars

It turns out that Tim Burton wasn't content with destroying our memories of beloved films like "Planet of the Apes" and "Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory," he now has to tarnish classic literature.


Alice 1

Oh yeah, this is "Alice in Wonderland" just like you remember it!

Notice all the...black...and the black...


While the director showed a brief return to form with 2008's "Sweeney Todd," that must have been a flash in the pain because "Alice in Wonderland" is most likely his worst film yet. This movie incorporates none of the dream logic, word puzzles, or child-like wonder of Lewis Carroll's timeless stories.


Instead the screenplay attempts to turn Wonderland into just another generic "dark fantasy" kingdom with a lore and backstory like Narnia and Middle-Earth - which completely misses the point of the story and instantly made me resentful.


Alice 6

And remember how "Alice in Wonderland" ended

with a big battle sequence like "Lord of the Rings"?

...you mean you don't remember?


Don't expect to be dazzled by the 3-D either, which was only added after the fact unlike "Avatar."


Burton's vision is more of a dour and ash-strewn, color-drained tour through Hot Topic Land.


Alice 3

I'm fairly certain that Tim Burton...


Alice 5

is the the only who thinks "Wonderland"...


Alice 4

should ever look this drab and unappealing


Johnny Depp delivers the most embarrassing performance of his career, with most of his inane mumbling lost on the soundtrack, while Burton has Anne Hathaway dolled up to look creepily like his ex-wife, Lisa Marie. Who wants to bet that Burton dumps Helena Bonham Carter for Hathaway in another few years?


Danny Elfman provides the soundtrack, which hits exactly all the cues you'd expect, with a choir of gothic school children doing their "lalala" thing every time some "stunning" new vista is revealed. It's all so dreadfully predictable.


Alice 8

Because dark eyebrows and lipstick look so appealing on a porcelain white face


At this point I think Burton's followers would have just as easy a time assembling one of his movies as the director does himself. Take a well-known and bankable property + Johnny Depp in a quirky, make-up heavy role + Elfman on the soundtrack=sell t-shirts and lunch boxes to all the kiddies in eyeliner.


About the only one who comes out of this thing unscathed is Stephen Fry, who delivers a fairly iconic performance of the Cheshire Cat. The cat is about the only character in the film that will make you say, "Ah, that's the Wonderland I remember." Elsewhere, Crispin Glover was cast simply to be weird and...that's about it. The sad thing is, Crispin Glover standing still is more strange than Burton himself has been in a long, long time.


Alice 7

I bet you can hear Danny Elfman's music in your head

without even having seen the movie. Admit it!


Allow me to put things in perspective for you: the Mad Hatter *breakdances* to a pop tune at the climax of the film. This is a kids movie that's not for kids and won't even please adults. About the only crowd who will enjoy this are the die-hard Burton fans who already have their Mad Hatter t-shirts on at the premiere. But at this point, Burton is just as washed up and talentless as that other former goth provocateur, Marilyn Manson.


Perhaps it's time he had his director's license revoked for a few years until he remembers something like the magic and wonder of "Edward Scissorhands" and "Beetlejuice." Hey, sometimes you need time away from your craft to realize why you fell in love with it in the first place. Burton needs to do something. Because this here, this is a soul-less pantomime of what a Disney movie should be. Don't waste your money on it or put your children through such an utterly boring, utterly depressing spectacle.


Alice 10

See? Tim Burton HAS sold out, he's standing in front of an American Apparel!


Friday, February 12, 2010

DRACULA A.D. 1972 (1972) - 4/5 stars

Dracula 1972 10
Release: 1972
Director: Alan Gibson
Writer: Don Houghton, Bram Stoker (funnily enough, IMDB lists him as an "uncredited writer" even though this is as far from Stoker's novel as you can get!)
Cast: Christopher Lee, Peter Cushing, Stephanie Beacham, Christopher Neame, Michael Coles, Marsha Hunt, Caroline Munro
Soundtrack: Michael Vickers
Claim to fame: it's Dracula - in London - circa 1972! Let the hijinks commence! Also, it was one of Hammer Films' last productions
Rating: 4/5 stars

Four stars may seem like a little much but I'll be honest: I loved this flick! "Dracula A.D. 1972" is technically my first introduction to the world of Hammer Films, the British movie studio responsible for producing many classic horror films during the 50's until the mid 70's, films that cemented Christopher Lee as THE Dracula and Peter Cushing as THE Dr. Van Helsing in the minds of many impressionable horror fans.


Although "Dracula A.D. 1972" is something of a black sheep in the Hammer catalog, it still features strong production values, a stylish look, and a genuine sense of Satanic dread.


Dracula 1972 8

The cinematography is frequently stunning in "Dracula A.D. 1972"


The film opens with a bang: it's the the 18th century and Dr. Van Helsing and Dracula are engaged in a battle to the death atop a runaway horse carriage. Hell yeah! Dracula meets a particularly gruesome fate - Drac doesn't care for wooden stakes, even if they're impromptly made from a broken wagon wheel -


drac17


and then we're whisked away to the London in the early 70's, which is just groovy, man.


drac16


drac15

Even if they didn't tell you in the title, I don't think

anyone would have trouble realizing this was the 70's


A warning is due to Christopher Lee fans: to tell the truth, Dracula is not in this movie that much. The focus is mostly on Christopher Neame as the sinister Johnny Alucard (what a cool name), who actually manages to upstage Dracula in terms of sheer evil. It's hard to believe that a few years later Neame would go on to play Romeo in a film adaptation of "Romeo & Juliet"!


He has a dynamic screen presence with his tall, angular figure dressed in black and a face that projects pure loathing for mere mortals.


dracula 1972 6

Johnny Alucard - not a fan of the humans


Unless you're a massive devotee of Christopher Lee, you'll probably find that Neame steals the show right out from under Dracula. See, Dracula doesn't even leave the desecrated church that serves as his homebase in this movie. He sends out Neame as an underling but that means that Neame gets to do all the fun stuff: seduce babes, bite their necks, and bring them back to Dracula to finish them off.


Meanwhile he's trying to keep his cover as a non-vampiric member of society. I love when he lies to his friends on the spot about a woman he just helped murder, like a Bret Easton Ellis character ("American Psycho") in training.


Dracula 1972 7

"Don't touch my cherries! Don't touch my cherries!"


Of course, the whole reason that this mess got started, why Dracula is even in the freakin' 70's, is because Neame manipulates his friends into performing Satanic rites in an abandoned church, with the aim of resurrecting Dracula. Neame is clearly the one in control here; his well-meaning friends are mere dupes with no idea what's in store for them.


The performance of the rites felt vividly real. As Neame bellowed "I SUMMON AN AUDIENCE WITH HIS SATANIC MAJESTY!" I was checking behind my couch for any signs of hellish smoke rising from the floor.


drac14


drac13


drac11


drac10


drac8


drac7


drac6


As the force of good in the film, Peter Cushing is excellent. He's quiet and gentle-natured but maintains a deep understanding of the evil in the world. Cushing's small, lean frame belies his large screen presence. He's kind of like the vampire ass-kicking, lovable grandpa you always wish you had. Though I have to say I felt bad for Cushing himself when he looked ready to fall over after running around the streets of London.


Also, it's kind of a shame we have to spend so much time with the Scotland Yard cop characters in the movie seeing as how they're only there to clue Cushing in to Dracula's plot, but the final confrontation between Cushing and Dracula is satisfyingly bloody and cathartic.


dracula 1972 4

Cushing shows thoughtful concern


The only drawback to the movie is its silly early 70's wannabe-funk score, which robs some scenes of their dramatic weight. But I suppose the film makes up for it with a bevy of cute hippie chicks. What can I say? Dracula has always had an eye for women.


Of particular note is Drac's first victim, Caroline Munro. Munro is sort of like a sex icon for movie geeks who didn't get laid much in the 70's, having starred in movies like this one and "The Abominable Dr. Phibes" (1971) and "The Golden Voyage of Sinbad" (1974). Yup, she's all woman, even when she's having steaming blood poured all over her cleavage.


drac1


drac2

If you're as f'ed up as me, you might find this totally hot


As I mentioned before, this movie has divided fans of Hammer Films. It has very mixed reviews at Netflix, with some claiming that placing Dracula in the then-modern, now-dated 70's London scene strained Hammer's credibility. You know, that might be the case but I had a blast watching this movie. Cheesy or not, it hit all the notes that I want out of a 70's vampire flick and featured a truly evil performance from Christopher Neame. Thus, "Dracula A.D. 1972" gets 4 stars for its fun factor alone.


dracula 1972 5
Whether in the 1800's or the 1970's,
Christopher Lee remains the definite Drac for many